McMan's Depression and Bipolar Web
  Home  Articles  Links  News  Newsletter  Books  Forum  Community  Search  Donate

Your Depression and Bipolar Disorder Source


Knowledge is Necessity


Soon, we may have safe alternatives to ECT, but can the treatments live up to their promise?


"My mother said she wasn't looking into the eyes of a dead person anymore."


Main articles page.

Go here.


More Treatment  Articles

Admitting You Need Help

Antidepressants - Part I

Antidepressants - Part II

Med Combos

When Your First Antidepressant Fails

When Your Second Antidepressant Fails

Treating to Remission

Antidepressants for the Long Haul

Bipolar Meds - Introduction

Bipolar Meds - Mood Stabilizers

Bipolar Meds - Antipsychotics

Algorithms For Meds Treatment

TIMA Algorithm

APA Bipolar Guidelines

BAP Bipolar Guidelines

Long Haul Bipolar Treatment

Treating Hypomania

Treating BP Depression

Remission for Bipolar

Drug Metabolism

FDA Antidepressant Suicide Warning

Three Paxil Studies

Prozac Mania

Pax-Ills

Worthless?

Talking Therapy Turbocharge

Cognitive Therapy

Long-Term Talking Therapy

Psycho-Battle

On the Couch

Screen Saver

Warning - Family Physician

ECT

Electroboy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Tickling the Brain - VNS and Other Treatments


ECT developed from the observation that electricity used to stun slaughterhouse pigs often resulted in convulsion, a sledge hammer approach that was applied with varying degrees of success and controversy to humans. These days, science is working on developing more subtle instruments, ones that tickle the brain with hopefully little or no side effects. But are they effective? To begin ...

Vagus Nerve Stimulation

In July 2005, the FDA approved the use of a surgical implant for adjunctive long-term treatment of  treatment resistant depression. After initially turning down its own panel's recommendation in August 2004, in late December the FDA granted "approvable" status, pending the resolution of a number of conditions. The therapy is called vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

In July 1998, surgeons implanted a pacemaker-like device into the chest of a bipolar patient with severe depression.  Within eight weeks, the patient moved out of his parentsí house and found a job (though he did cycle into irritable mania).

The implement sends an electrical pulse up a wire into the vagus nerve in the neck at the base of the brain. The pulses usually last thirty seconds and occur every three to five minutes. The battery lasts five years. PET scans reveal that VNS therapy modulates activity in regions of the brain believed to be involved in mood regulation, including limbic structures and specific cortical areas such as the orbitofrontal cortex.

VNS has been in use for epilepsy patients in Europe since 1994 and the US since 1997. Cyberonics, the Houston company that developed and manufactures the device, first approached Mark George MD, a psychiatrist and neurologist at the Medical University of South Carolina to see if there might be a wider application . Because epilepsy meds also work for bipolar patients, Dr George thought there might be a parallel. Dr George recruited three other researchers - Lauren Marangell MD at Baylor College of Medicine, A John Rush MD of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and Harold Sackeim PhD at Columbia University - and together they enrolled 30 depressed unipolar and bipolar patients for an open trial, and 30 more patients a year later.

The patients had been in major depression for more than six years and had failed numerous treatments - including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and ECT. Patients were allowed to stay on their current medications According to Dr George, the 60 patients represented "maybe the most ill cohort ever published."

Thirty percent of the patients responded after 12 weeks. A "response" is measured as at least a 50 percent improvement in symptoms. Patients who had failed on two or three antidepressants fared best. Those who failed on more than seven antidepressants did not respond at all. Twenty-one percent of all the patients remitted - that is, they achieved a symptom-free or near symptom-free state - a finding that took the researchers by surprise: "Iíve been treating these kinds of patients for more than a decade and Iíve never seen anything like it," Dr George told this writer in 2002.

The bipolar depressed patients had similar results as the unipolar depressed patients. One bipolar patient and one unipolar patient switched into hypomania, causing one drop-out amongst the entire 60.

After one year, 41 percent of the original 30 patients had responded, and 26 had remitted. At least 90 percent of the responders were still responding after one year. After two years, response rates had climbed to 54 percent.. Dr George did not rule out the fact that the improved numbers over the course of time could have been due to the patientsí depressions independently abating, but he also pointed out that it is unlikely a placebo response could have been maintained for two years.

In 2001, Cyberonics enlisted 235 patients in a 12-week double-blind clinical trial (in which half of the devices were switched on and the other half left off), along with their current meds. Subjects had failed at least two and up to six different types of antidepressant treatments in their current episodes, had been in their current depression two or more years or had experienced recurring depression four or more times, with Hamilton depression scores of at least 20.

Said Cyberonics CEO Skip Cummins on a June 2004 conference call:  "These were hopeless, desperate, suicidal patients, not expected to respond."

Unfortunately, the patients lived up to expectations. Trial results in early 2002 turned out to be a major disappointment, delaying indefinitely what had been considered imminent FDA approval (which had been granted fast track review). Undaunted, Cyberonics continued with the study with 205 patients, this time switching on all the devices. At the same time, the company enrolled 124 similarly depressed patients for treatment as usual without VNS. After 12 months, response rates for the VNS group on two different depression scales were 21 percent and 30 percent, respectively vs 12 and 13 percent in the treatment as usual group. Remission rates were 16 and 17 percent for the VNS group vs five and seven percent for those on treatment as usual.

Ordinarily, a study with this design and these results never would have made it past the FDA door man. Two randomized double-blind controlled studies with at least a 50 percent response is generally what it takes to get a panel to review a manufacturer's submission. This was but a single open trial, effectively comparing apples to oranges, with a mere 30 percent success rate (or putting it another way, a 70 percent failure rate), and the statistician and others on the panel reacted to the data in a matter akin to the membership committee at the Augusta National Country Club hearing of someone with a skirt on the premises.

What carried the day was a forceful presentation by Cyberonics that 20 percent of 19 million depressed Americans fall into the "treatment resistant" category - people who fail their meds or ECT and suffer constant rounds of recurring episodes. These people, said Cyberonics, have no FDA approved treatment alternatives.

To help make its case, Cyberonics turned to one of the top depression experts in the field, Dr Rush, a pioneer in psychiatric treatment algorithms, head of the NIMH-underwritten STAR*D clinical trials for treating depression, as well as one of the lead researchers involved in the VNS studies. Before the FDA panel, he painted a clinical picture of despairing and suicidal patients unable to work full-time, frequently using the hospital or ER, frequently changing meds. Treatment resistant depression is a long standing, life-threatening disabling illness, he concluded, equivalent to other severe psychiatric illness, including schizophrenia.

The panel was also swayed by the testimony of some of the study patients. One such patient, who simply identified herself as Patient 012 from Site 050 and testified before the FDA on her own volition and at her own expense, i well worth quoting at length:

"My case (and testimony) may be of particular interest to this panel because: I went into the study on no medications; remained off medications throughout the study; and, am still on no medications. There is no other explanation for my response other than the device, itself. It is good science. Turn the device up, I respond. Turn the device down, I decline. ...

"I realize that most on this panel and most in attendance are experts in their field ... but there is one thing I can offer you about which you know nothing: and that is first-hand knowledge of what it is like to have severe, recalcitrant depression.

"And to do so, I ask you to imagine the unimaginable. To think the unthinkable. To experience second-degree emotional burns with third-degree prognosis. All you experience is pain, but with no cure. In fact, there is no viable treatment. You can attempt to salve it. Only death solves it.

"But the medical community does not accept death as a cure. It asks us to continue to hang on and to continue to live, yet offers us no viable treatments. Trust me, itís not that we donít want to live. Itís that we donít want to live Ďlike this.í Our illness is embedded in our physical bodies, our cells, we are prisoners there and our sentence is life.

"Menacing insomnia; isolation; fear; anxiety; sadness; hopelessness; general malaise; malingering fatigue; physical exhaustion; apathy; lack of motivation, concentration, and focus; absence of pleasure; amplification of pain; agitation; sensitivity to criticism; thoughts that life isnít worth living. You are familiar with this short-sheeted laundry list of symptoms. Now imagine having them all at once. Imagine passing from one room to another in the House of Pain where some symptoms are more prevalent than others, sometimes exacerbated by the very medications that were meant to alleviate them.

"I will not bore you with the details of the pharmacopoeia that I have tried and that have failed, not to mention the acupuncture; homeopathy; herbal remedies; extreme dietary changes and supplements; light therapy; counseling; yoga, and of course religion. What God would let a child suffer like this?

"And then comes the inevitable: electroconvulsive therapy. ECT. A therapy so beyond the vernacular, that it doesnít even pass an automated spell check. Iíd stop at the word, too. But as a person with treatment-resistant depression, I could not stop. I relented to this FDA-approved treatment as a last resort. Average session: 3-5 treatments: I had 33 nearly consecutive treatments. I lost, retrograde, 20 years of my life through memory loss: a dismal blessing. At least I could not remember the horrific pain that preceded it for years. ...

"I am not going to idealize nor sentimentalize the device. I know I am one of the third who have responded to it. I know there are others who continue to suffer the burden of treatment-resistant depression. I see it in their faces as I sit in the lobby and wait my turn at my site. I know that pain. I suffered it prior to the VNS. Still, I have windows of it now and again.

"I am passionate - yet realistic - about the device. I do not romanticize its results for me nor dismiss its lack-of-results for others. I am well aware of its side effects, shortcomings, and current experimental status. But, I do know one thing: we need viable treatment options for those with recalcitrant depression, and the VNS has worked for me."

What also influenced the panel was the device's relatively benign side effects profile. Only three percent in the VNS group dropped out over 12 months due to adverse events. By contrast, about 15 percent of patients drop out of antidepressant trials due to adverse events after just four to eight weeks. The main side effect was voice alteration (hoarseness), which occurred in 68 percent of the patients during the initial 12-week phase of the study. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced coughing. Physicians can adjust settings using special software, and patients can diminish side effects by turning down the device with a magnetic wand.

The FDA indication is the first ever for treatment resistant depression, a coup for Cyberonics, but the panel did stipulate that the device should only be used for patients who did not respond to at least four other types of treatment. The panel also set other conditions, including educating the surgeons who would implant the device, educating psychiatrists and patients, and establishing a patient registry.

Patients interested in VNS should expect sticker shock. The current model retails at $15,000, a future one is expected to be priced at $18,000, and the surgical procedure may go $15,000 and higher. Cyberonics, however, has an answer to this. A 2004 Cyberonics study showed that patients who had changed their meds eight times incurred health care costs of $1,200 per month, twice that of patients who had just two med changes. The company is confident health care providers will do the numbers and see the cost-benefit of including VNS in their coverage. CMS, which administers US Medicaid and Medicare, has already approved the device for epilepsy. Other providers have granted conditional approval for treatment resistant depression.

The surgery is fairly straightforward. Epilepsy.com reports that "the surgeon first makes an incision along the outer side of the chest on the left side, and the device is implanted under the skin. Then a second incision is made horizontally in the lower neck, along a crease of skin, and the wire from the stimulator is wound around the vagus nerve in the left side of the neck. The brain itself is not involved in the surgery. ...

"The procedure usually lasts about 50 to 90 minutes with the patient under general anesthesia. Sometimes a hospital stay of one night is required. Some surgeons have performed the procedure with local anesthesia and the patient has been discharged the same day."

rTMS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation was first developed by Dr Anthony Barker and his colleagues at the University of Sheffield (UK) in the 1980s. The technique is based on the principle that running a current through a coil of wire generates a magnetic field, which passes through the skull and into the brain. The neurons in the brain are activated by a secondary current induced by the magnetic field.

Technological improvements led to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and new coil design made it easier to target small areas of the brain. In the early 1990s, scientists began applying rTMS to mood disorders. rTMS works by stimulating parts of the prefrontal cortex, resulting in dopamine release in the caudate region, according to a 2001 PET scan study. rTMS has a limited range in the brain, but a number of brain scan studies reveal activity deeper down in the limbic system, thanks to circuitry extending down from the cortex.

rTMS is an outpatient procedure, but not a particularly pleasant one. Depending on the intensity of the frequency, patients can experience headaches and unwelcome noise The most critical concern is the risk of seizure. For this reason, low frequency rTMS is preferred over high frequency. Frequencies are adjusted to an individual's "motor threshold."

A 2003 study of 60 depressed patients found high frequency rTMS applied to the left side or low frequency rTMS applied to the right prefrontal cortex yielded better results than sham treatment. It took at least four weeks to receive a clinical benefit. A 2002 study of 60 depressed patients (20 treatments over four weeks)  found rTMS compared favorably to ECT. Studies on patients with psychotic depression, however, have found that ECT is more effective than rTMS for this population. A 2004 study found the treatment worked for bipolar depression.

A 2004 open study of nine manic patients using adjunctive rTMS suggested a potential benefit. A 2003 study, however, failed.

These and other small studies are encouraging, but hardly constitute a strong body of clinical evidence. An rTMS manufacturer, Neuronetics, is attempting to rectify that by recruiting patients for a major trial in 14 states, with the goal of seeking an FDA indication. Since getting into a trial is virtually the only way of receiving this treatment, one may wish to check out the information on the company's website or visit this website, which lists trials. Columbia University is also conducting large scale studies, and its specific web page will be posted as soon as it becomes available.

MST

A new twist to rTMS occurred in mid-2001 when researchers at Columbia University induced seizures similar to ECT. Known as magnetic seizure therapy (MST), ten people were given both ECT and TMS.  According to the
study's author, Sarah Lisanby MD, it took patients 13 minutes to become reoriented after ECT compared to less than two minutes after TMS.

With ECT, the skull acts as a resistor, which results in the scattering of energy throughout the brain, producing unintended side effects. With TMS, energy passes through the skull as if it were transparent. According to information provided by Columbia U:

"Magnetic stimulation may offer a better way to perform convulsive therapy because magnetic fields enter the brain more easily than the electricity used with ECT. This means that the magnetic fields can be focused more precisely on specific regions of the brain important to depression, allowing us to avoid the regions of the brain that control memory."

A 2003 Columbia University study of 10 patients with severe depression alternated MST and ECT sessions during a course of treatments, with patients examined after each session. According to the authors of the study: "Patients had fewer subjective side effects and recovered orientation more quickly with MST than ECT. MST was also superior to ECT on measures of attention, retrograde amnesia, and category fluency."

Sarah Lisanby MD of Columbia University explained at the 2005 APA meeting that MST allows for more precise targeting into the brain. The aim is to induce seizures that do not spread to the motor cortex, thus sparing the memory regions of the brain. A study on primates showed better memory after MST than electroshock. Human subjects reoriented themselves much quicker after MST than ECT and experienced less retrograde amnesia.

Brain Probes and Deep Brain Stimulation

A taste of the future was offered at the 2005 APA meeting by Benjamin Greenberg MD PhD of Brown University. Needle-like leads with four electrodes are inserted into targeted regions of the brain, guided by MRI scans. An extension wire runs from each lead to one or more VNS-like devices implanted in the chest. The treatment is FDA-approved for Parkinsonís, and is being investigated for OCD and depression. OCD patients reported changes in mood within two minutes of the device being switched on. A small pilot study on depressed patients had a similar effect. When the device was turned off or the battery failed, the patients got worse.

A 2005 study by Helen Mayberg MD of Emory University identified Brodmann area 25 (not to be confused with Area 52) in the subgenual cingulate region. Four of six treatment-resistant patients remitted when the adjacent white matter was stimulated.

Deep brain stimulation may supplant cingulotomies and capsulotomies, surgeries that have been used for OCD and are being investigated for depression. Guided by brain scans, a "Gamma Knife" (beams of gamma radiation) cuts lesions in specific areas of the brain. Unlike deep brain stimulation, the surgery is irreversible.

MRI Scans

A funny thing happened when researchers at McLean Hospital outside Boston performed a routine brain scan study of depressed bipolar patients: Many of them emerged from a new type of MRI machine announcing they were feeling a lot better.

A follow up study in 2003 found 23 of 30 patients reported significant improvement after undergoing an MRI compared to those having a sham MRI.

Updated May 15, 2007

For three free online issues of McMan's Depression and Bipolar Weekly, email me and put "Sample" in the heading and your email address in the body.

Treatment articles   All articles

For three free online issues of McMan's Depression and Bipolar Weekly, email me and put "Sample" in the heading and your email address in the body.


 Discussions

Kimberley (March 20, 2001):  Great article. Unfortunately, they are still in the research and development phase. I applied at the Clarke Institute (Toronto, CANADA) last June 2000. The doctors said I would not be a good candidate due to efficacy failure of more than 7 anti-depressants. Needless to say I was very disappointed. I hope that they will get more funding for this procedure so they can try it on patients like me who are likely to fail. If someone said I could have this procedure
tomorrow--I would be waiting at the OR...

Sue (June 24, 2003):  Nice article. I just want to inform your readers of inflation. I had the VNS surgery as an outpatient for my epilepsy on May 1, 2003 and the total damage was $50,000.  Luckily for me the insurance co. picked up the whole tab!! You better check with yours first though. By the way, it is helping for my seizures. I have to wait and see for my depression. Good Luck!    

LostBoyinNC (Dec 23, 2004):  Soon after being dxed with "treatment resistant depression" in fall 1998, it was suggested I begin to consider ECT. I naturally didnt want to go that route at that time for obvious reasons. I began frantically searching alternatives, which basically meant scouring the Internet for any clinical trial relating to refractory major depression. I could find very little on severe, treatment resistant depression. Most of what I found revolved around ECT. However, one thing I was able to find was something described as rTMS. I found out a local teaching hospital with a good reputation was having rTMS clinical trials for severe treatment resistant major depression. I called them, had my records sent to them for review, made a trip to Charleston, SC at the Medical University of South Carolina and was intensively screened by some good psychiatrists. I was given the SCID-1 or "Structured Clinical Interview for Axis One disorders." This was to assess my true Axis one disorder(s), which was required in order to be accepted into the trial. The SCID-1 ruled out bipolar disorder and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, chronic substance abuse, etc. I was accepted into the rTMS clinical trial at MUSC in late January 1999.

I returned about a month later, off all antidepressants. I lived in a local hotel and showed up for about 20 to 30 minutes every morning outpatient, to receive rTMS treatment. I received two weeks worth of rTMS and returned home. I was treated extremely well at MUSC, it was the most professional psychiatric treatment I have received up to this point. I returned a month later to be "unblinded" by none other than Dr. Mark George, MD himself. I was told I had received "sham" rTMS...or placebo. I was then told I could return for two weeks of open trial rTMS...and get the real thing.

I returned in July 1999 and again checked into a local hotel. I received two weeks of actual rTMS. The first week was done by Mark George himself. Side effects were nil...you have to wear ear plugs because the machine is loud. It makes your eyes water a little bit, for reasons I dont know and didnt care. I could feel an immediate mood lift after each rTMS session, although it was nothing that dramatic. At the end of the first week, I had a two or three hour period where it sort of "broke thru" and I felt really normal for several hours. Then it faded out. The second week was administered by other psychiatrists and they didnt seem to have the skill at administering rTMS that Mark George had and the results were just "OK." Results would be immediate, but faded out by around lunchtime. Overall, the antidepressant effect was not exactly what Id call robust.

I returned home feeling not bad, but nowhere near normal or what I had hoped for. I dont consider the present form of rTMS nearly as robust and effective as old style, conventional ECT as a result of my experience with rTMS. I personally think rTMS, VNS and MST are all shams and a waste of research money. I dont think any of these modalities are strong enough to combat severe mental illness. I believe there is a small group of Neuropsychiatric researchers who are committed to these high tech modalities, which are minimally invasive and have minimal side effects. However I dont believe these things work.

To back up my personal belief, in the recent September 2003 issue of "Scientific American" there was an article by Dr. Mark George himself in which he openly admitted that rTMS and VNS had not proven themselves effective for severe depression. This is coming from the foremost proponent of MIBS or "Minimally Invasive Brain Stimulation" treatments in the USA.  Dr. George, in this article, talked about how rTMS didnt penetrate very deep into the brain and only targeted the "outer cortex" of the brain. Not strong enough to reach the "deep brain structures" responsible for regulating the neuroendocrine aspects of the brain. Which is strongly suspected as being the root cause of severe mood disorders. This includes the deep brain structures such as the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus.

ECT, by inducing a generalized grand mal seizure directly stimulates the deepest areas of the brain and is said to "recalibrate" the delicate neuroendocrine aspects of the brain. rTMS does not have this ability.


As a result of my personal experiences with rTMS combined with extensive reading about rTMS and other MIBS treatments, I have concluded that rTMS is another form of quack medicine and does not deserve research dollars. Its extremely safe and like I said, its side effect profile is extremely good. The problem is that it just doesn't work that great. Why continue spending scarce research money studying something that probably has minimal effectiveness for severe mental illness?

rTMS has been around a while now. There have been enough trials to determine whether its truly effective or not. Plus, its safety profile has been well established. If it were truly effective, I suspect it would have been FDA approved for severe depression or refractory depression by now. It hasn't. And I don't believe it ever will be FDA approved for severe depression, because I don't believe it works. I believe its hype...like many things in psychiatry. Hype abounds. Claims abound.

My advice for anyone who has severe medication resistant depression and is in a "crisis situation" is to go back to basics and undergo conventional ECT. ECT has proven effectiveness, unlike rTMS or VNS.

Meghan (Jan 17, 2005):  VNS treatment I have been a patient of Dr. Mark George since 2000. I have no doubt in my mind that Rush and George will have this disease \"figured out\" sooner than imagined. This is their work every single day and night. They are determined, just look at what they've accomplished so far. A cure is on its way.

K (Dec 22, 2004):   I have had 2 sets of treatment with rTMS. This has been the wonder-treatment I've searched for. I suffer from chronic, treatment-resistant depression, and have been through every classification of medication available, usually at least 2 meds from each classification. Nothing worked well, or for long. Until rTMS.

rTMS is available in Vancouver and Toronto Canada, at the Mindcare Centre. To me, it was worth every penny to feel this well.

JP 2/20:  I am dubious of the pro-VNS patient calling herself   "Patient 012 from Site 050.  "She claims to have previously 33 nearly consecutive treatments of ECT that were unsuccessful but that VNS stimulation has   "worked " for her. In   '99, one of the study groups at Columbia Presbyterian comprised solely of patients who had previously failed to respond to ECT had a 100% FAILURE response to VNS. Shortly thereafter, Cyberonics stopped all ECT failures from becoming involved in the case studies. Furthermore, this patient states,   "I know I am one of the third who have responded to it" when Cyberonics themselves only claim a 1 in 5 response. Finally, anyone familiar with the aggressive marketing tactics of Cyberonics would find it hard to believe she testified before the FDA   "at her own expense."

My observations are that VNS is at the most successful in only 1 out of 6 cases and that when the required 2nd surgery for device removal occurs there is at least a 30% chance of permanently damaging the nerves to the vocal chords.  With these odds (e.g. 5 of 6 patients having device fail and thus necessitating removal gives 83.3% removal rate and 83.3% X 30% chance of injury means 25% of patients have vocal chord damage while only 16.6% aided their depression).

Post your opinion  here.

John McManamy

Order my book on Amazon

Order now


Newsletter

Your online source for issues that matter to you.

For free samples, email me and put "Sample" in the heading and your email address in the body.

Find out more.


Bookstore

Shop for depression and bipolar books online here.


The VNS implant.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Fooled you: This is a hair dryer.


 

 

 

 

 


This is the real deal: rTMS being demonstrated at Columbia U.